Edwin Boyd Hits the Big Screen

By Nate Hendley

Dashing criminal Edwin Alonzo Boyd, who headed up the bank-robbing Boyd Gang in Toronto in the early 1950s, was the subject of my first book.

The same man is now the subject of a great Canadian flick soon to enter wide release called Edwin Boyd: Citizen Gangster.  The film features handsome Scott Speedman (he of Felicity and Underworld fame) as the titular character.

Good-looking Boyd (who closely resembled matinee idol Errol Flynn) was a flamboyant character who enjoyed jumping on bank counters, guns in hand, announcing a hold-up was in progress. Given that Toronto was an uptight backwater at the time, the Boyd Gang made for sensational headlines. The fact the gang twice broke out of the notorious Don Jail also added to their allure.

Boyd earned a reputation as a “gentleman bandit” who never harmed anyone during his robberies. The same can’t be said for two members of his crew, Steve Suchan and Lennie Jackson, who were hanged for gunning down Toronto police detective Eddie Tong.

Interestingly enough, Boyd himself was the son of a Toronto policeman and worked at several legitimate jobs, including bus driver, before turning into a gangster. He also served in the army in World War Two.

Boyd spent part of the 1950s and 60s in prison then was released. He lived in anonymity in British Columbia, dying peacefully at age 88 in 2002.

Around the time Boyd expired, CBC-TV aired a documentary about his life. Said doc strongly suggested that gentlemanly Boyd actually committed a couple murders for which he was never caught or convicted.

Edwin Boyd: Citizen Gangster doesn’t touch on such controversies, but it is a terrific movie. I saw last year where it played at the Toronto Film Festival before a packed house. While not a big-budget production, the film does accurately capture Boyd’s strange charisma and short existence as Canada’s number one criminal.

To watch a trailer for Edwin Boyd: Citizen Gangster on Youtube, click here: http://tinyurl.com/75rlap7

(Nate Hendley is a Toronto-based author and writer. Click on this link for information on his books)

Bonnie and Clyde: On the Cutting Edge of Crime

(Excerpt from Bonnie and Clyde: A Biography by Nate Hendley)

Bonnie Parker and Clyde Barrow were cutting-edge criminals operating in a rural environment that had barely advanced from the 19th Century. Few American farms had electricity in the early 1930s and horses were still used to transport people and crops. Telephones weren’t common in country residences. Police departments in rural and small-town communities were understaffed and under-funded, if not downright incompetent.  Archaic laws made it difficult for police officers to chase criminals across state or county lines. Local cops couldn’t rely on a powerful federal presence to help them out either. As late as 1933, agents from the Federal Bureau of Investigation weren’t allowed to carry guns or make arrests.

Bonnie and Clyde thrived in this milieu. Using fast Ford V-8s, they could zip from community to community and make speedy getaways. Clyde’s preference for Browning Automatic Rifles (BARs), which could spit out 20 bullets in under three seconds, meant that the Barrow gang was usually better-equipped then most small-town police departments.

The presence of Bonnie added a curious, contemporary twist to the Barrow gang’s exploits.

Unlike Clyde, Bonnie was not a young offender who fell into crime almost as a habit. By all accounts, she was an intelligent, high-spirited girl brought up by a normal, loving family. Bonnie always remained close to her family, risking arrest or capture to visit her kin. All sources agree that Bonnie was deeply in love with Clyde. It’s unclear how smitten Clyde was in return.

If Bonnie was loving and loyal to Clyde, the exact nature of her role in the Barrow gang is open to dispute. Some movies and books have portrayed Bonnie as the real boss of the Barrow crew, ordering around a meek and mild Clyde. As intriguing as they are, such depictions aren’t accurate. Captured members of the Barrow gang always insisted that Clyde led and Bonnie followed. Clyde Barrow was the undisputed leader of the gang that bore his name.

Some of Bonnie’s criminal cohorts say she never even fired a gun, much less killed anyone. Other witnesses depict her as a gun-loving shrew, who laughed as she killed two badly wounded motorcycle policemen lying helplessly by a Texas highway.

The extent of Bonnie’s private relationship with Clyde has also been grounds for much speculation. It’s not even clear if they were lovers, as well as partners in crime. Some historical accounts offer lurid portraits of a nymphomaniac Bonnie, seducing the male members of the Barrow gang when Clyde couldn’t please her. Other accounts depict Clyde as gay or impotent—more interested in guns than sex.

Regardless of her private relations with Clyde, it was clear that Bonnie was no ordinary moll. While she deferred to Clyde’s leadership, she wasn’t submissive or subservient. Unlike Blanche, the wife of Clyde’s older brother, Buck, Bonnie wasn’t prone to hysterics. She didn’t lose her cool, even when caught in a police ambush. She was willing to risk death and jail to stay with Clyde. She was always by his side, even during shootouts.

It was this “stand-by-your-man” quality that separated Bonnie from other female felons of the Depression.

“Most so-called ‘gun molls’ were never more than mistresses or wives, and rarely took part in the action,” notes crime writer and historian Rick Mattix.

Without Bonnie, Clyde would have been regarded as a two-bit cop-killer with a grudge against society.

Bonnie was arguably the smartest member of the Barrow gang. She certainly was the most artistically inclined. Two poems she wrote helped cement Bonnie and Clyde’s legend. These works make good use of rhyming verse and criminal lingo to glorify the Barrow crew. One poem, entitled, “The Story of Bonnie and Clyde”, became widely published following the death of its subjects.

“The Story of Bonnie Clyde” rather falsely glorifies its subjects, portraying them as poor, put-upon folks striking back against oppressive police. Clyde comes across as downright noble in this work, an admirable person not a low-life criminal. No matter. Bonnie’s verses firmly became entrenched in the popular consciousness, even if they were nothing more than fantasy.

(Nate Hendley is a Toronto-based author and writer. Click on this link for information on his books)

Meth on Stage

(Excerpt from the book, Crystal Death by Nate Hendley)

“Meth” was the name of a combined play and interactive event put on by Headlines Theatre, an edgy but professional company based in Vancouver, BC.

“The company’s work has always been issue-based,” explains artistic and managing director David Diamond, over the phone.

Diamond helped found the group back in 1981. Previous works put on by Headlines include plays on racism, violence, homelessness, safe sex, affordable housing, Palestine and Israel, poverty, etc.

“We got a call from the Sto:Lo nation here in Fraser Valley … they wanted to know if we would come and talk about a project,” recalls Diamond, citing the genesis of the “Meth”.

On January 6, 2006, staff from Headlines met with the Sto:Lo First Nations band in Chilliwack, BC. One of the elders praised Headlines for a 1992 performance called “Out of the Silence” that explored the previously taboo topic of family violence in Indian communities.

“She said, ‘We were wondering if you could do something like ‘The Silence’ on methamphetamine—because it’s killing our communities’,” recalls Diamond.

A decision was made and Headlines Theatre committed itself to putting on a production about methamphetamine addiction. Staff set about fundraising (while Headlines gets some cash from the Canada Council and other government bodies, they also rely on donations and sponsorships to cover the cost of productions. “Meth” was initially budgeted at about $150 – 180,000), casting and generating ideas.

The word went out that Headlines was interested in contacting former meth users or friends and family of users.

“We were looking for people who had issues with meth, either ex-addicts—they couldn’t be current addicts—or people who had loved ones who had been addicted,” explains Diamond.

Headlines received applications for 59 people with some association with meth. This was whittled down to a core group of 21. Out of this smaller group, Diamond selected six actors to perform in the play. The cast consisted of native and non-natives alike, most of whom were not professional thespians. Three of the actors were former meth addicts while the other three had meth-addicted family members.

A workshop was held, with actors, contributors and Headlines staff to determine the play’s content.  The idea was to depict the lives of methamphetamine users in a brutally honest fashion. Through intense discussion and improvisation the structure, dialogue and plot of the play was worked out. Among other things, the play would depict the violent, sordid existence of meth addicts inside a “crank house”.

“Meth” debuted November 30, 2006 in Vancouver and proved an instant hit. Headlines Theatre took to the road, performing the play in over two-dozen BC communities. This was no small feat: “we travelled with a 15-passenger van and five-ton truck,” says Diamond.

The sets and lighting were handled by professionals and everyone involved in the production was paid union wages—“it’s not a little skit,” notes Diamond, about the show.

While professionally presented, the performance was anything but traditional. A typical performance consisted of the play itself—which lasted about 25 minutes—followed by what Diamond refers to as “an event”. The actors returned to the stage to start the play all over again, this time with audience participation. Audience members could yell “Stop!” and take to the stage themselves, to interact with the performers or add their own insights about methamphetamine addiction. Diamond’s role was to play “The Joker”—a facilitator who introduced the play, encouraged audience participation and put forward questions to provoke discussion.

This highly interactive theatrical experience hit a nerve and was well-received, with over 5,600 people taking in the show at 28 BC performances. An anonymous donation of around $170,000 from a foundation allowed Headlines to host a western Canada tour in 2008. The play underwent a name-change, to “Shattering” but otherwise was still focused on meth in specific and addiction in general.

“I don’t think this play could have been written by a writer or performed by actors that didn’t have lived experiences [with meth],” states Diamond.

He makes it clear, however, that this was a theatrical, not a therapeutic, forum. Performing the play was hard work—“it’s not therapy for them,” says Diamond, about the actors involved.

“We weren’t touring to save anyone’s life—how presumptuous of us to do that … we were touring to stimulate and be part of as deep a conversation about addiction as possible in every community we were in, period,” he continues.

The play “managed to be very authentic. It had a profound effect on people all over western Canada. It was a really successful piece … audience members, regardless of where they were coming from, could sit there and recognize themselves and how they fit into the addiction puzzle in their own communities,” Diamond adds.

(Nate Hendley is a Toronto-based author and writer. Click on this link for information on his books)

Look, LEAP, Listen

By Nate Hendley

Here’s an anniversary you might have missed: on March 16, a group called LEAP turned 10 years-old.

LEAP stands for “Law Enforcement Against Prohibition” and is an international association of cops, judges, prison officials and politicians who think the time has come to remove criminal penalties on illegal drugs.

“Our experience on the front lines of the “war on drugs” has led us to call for a repeal of prohibition and its replacement with a tight system of legalized regulation, which will effectively cripple the violent cartels and street dealers who control the current illegal market,” reads the Medford, Massachusetts-based association’s website.

Originally founded by five cops, the group now claims over a thousand members from the world of law enforcement and 50,000 civilian supporters. Members include former New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson, Chief Joseph McNamara (chief of police for San Jose, California for 15 years), Chief Norm Stamper (former chief of police for Seattle, Washington) and Senator Larry Campbell (former mayor of drug-riddled Vancouver, BC, retired RCMP officer and now a member of Canada’s Senate).

“We believe that drug prohibition is the true cause of much of the social and personal damage that has historically been attributed to drug use. It is prohibition that makes these drugs so valuable – while giving criminals a monopoly over their supply. Driven by the huge profits from this monopoly, criminal gangs bribe and kill each other, law enforcers, and children. Their trade is unregulated and they are, therefore, beyond our control … Prohibition costs taxpayers tens of billions of dollars every year, yet 40 years and some 40 million arrests later, drugs are cheaper, more potent and far more widely used than at the beginning of this futile crusade,” reads the LEAP site.

Scrapping prohibition would let law officers focus on more serious offences like rape, assault and murder, while reducing opportunities for police corruption. Prison costs would go drastically down while public confidence in police (shaken by cases of police taking bribes or helping themselves to cash while busting dealers) would be restored, states LEAP.

None of these ideas are terribly original or new. Drug law reform groups like the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML), the Marijuana Policy Project (MPP), as well as assorted libertarians and activists have been putting forward the same points for years.

It’s easy however, to ignore calls for legalization from spaced out hippies and armchair theorists—as drug law reformers are typically portrayed in the media. It’s much tougher to ignore the message when it comes from a cop. If current and former peace officers are willing to say publicly that certain laws cause more harm than good, people should pay close attention.

So, happy birthday to LEAP, as the group enters its second decade—lawmen and women advocating a radical change in the way society deals with dope.

(Nate Hendley is a Toronto-based author and writer. Click on this link for information on his books)

Tough on Crime, Low on Smarts?

By Nate Hendley

Canada’s majority Conservative government is set to pass Bill C-10, the controversial Safe Streets and Communities Act.

Said act introduces mandatory minimum sentences for a variety of crimes, including small-time drug trafficking and child exploitation.

The Act was introduced despite declining crime rates. When asked about this discrepancy, Public Safety Minister Vic Toews said he wasn’t interested in statistics.

Nor are the Tories interested in listening to concerns from Canadian pundits and American criminologists who warn that the U.S. experience with tough mandatory minimums has been a disaster.

With C-10 set to become law, perhaps within days, it’s worth looking back on what the Canadian Bar Association had to say about the Act.

Here’s a CBA press release from last fall:

November 17, 2011

10 Reasons to Oppose Bill C-10

Bill C-10 is titled the Safe Streets and Communities Act — an ironic name, considering that Canada already has some of the safest streets and communities in the world and a declining crime rate. This bill will do nothing to improve that state of affairs, but, through its overreach and overreaction to imaginary problems, Bill C-10 could easily make it worse. It could eventually create the very problems it’s supposed to solve.

Bill C-10 will require new prisons; mandate incarceration for minor, non-violent offences; justify poor treatment of inmates and make their reintegration into society more difficult. Texas and California, among other jurisdictions, have already started down this road before changing course, realizing it cost too much and made their justice system worse. Canada is poised to repeat their mistake.

The Canadian Bar Association, representing over 37,000 lawyers across the country, has identified 10 reasons why the passage of Bill C-10 will be a mistake and a setback for Canada.

1. Ignoring reality. Decades of research and experience have shown what actually reduces crime: (a) addressing child poverty, (b) providing services for the mentally ill and those afflicted with FASD, (c) diverting young offenders from the adult justice system, and (d) rehabilitating prisoners, and helping them to reintegrate into society. Bill C-10 ignores these proven facts.

2. Rush job. Instead of receiving a thorough review, Bill C-10 is being rushed through Parliament purely to meet the “100-day passage” promise from the last election. Expert witnesses attempting to comment on over 150 pages of legislation in committee hearings are cut off mid-sentence after just five minutes.

3. Spin triumphs over substance. The federal government has chosen to take a “marketing” approach to Bill C-10, rather than explaining the facts to Canadians. This campaign misrepresents the bill’s actual content and ensures that its public support is based heavily on inaccuracies.

4. No proper inspection. Contrary to government claims, some parts of Bill C-10 have received no previous study by Parliamentary committee. Other sections have been studied before and were changed — but, in Bill C-10, they’re back in their original form.

5. Wasted youth. More young Canadians will spend months in custodial centres before trial, thanks to Bill C-10. Experience has shown that at-risk youth learn or reinforce criminal behaviour in custodial centres; only when diverted to community options are they more likely to be reformed.

6. Punishments eclipse the crime. The slogan for one proposal was Ending House Arrest for Serious and Violent Criminals Act, but Bill C-10 will actually also eliminate conditional sentences for minor and property offenders and instead send those people to jail. Is roughly $100,000 per year to incarcerate someone unnecessarily a good use of taxpayers’ money?

7. Training predators. Bill C-10 would force judges to incarcerate people whose offences and circumstances clearly do not warrant time in custody. Prison officials will have more latitude to disregard prisoners’ human rights, bypassing the least restrictive means to discipline and control inmates. Almost every inmate will re-enter society someday. Do we want them to come out as neighbours, or as predators hardened by their prison experience?

8. Justice system overload. Longer and harsher sentences will increase the strains on a justice system already at the breaking point. Courts and Crown prosecutors’ offices are overwhelmed as is, legal aid plans are at the breaking point, and police forces don’t have the resources to do their jobs properly. Bill C-10 addresses none of these problems and will make them much worse.

9. Victimizing the most vulnerable. With mandatory minimums replacing conditional sentences, people in remote, rural and northern communities will be shipped far from their families to serve time. Canada’s Aboriginal people already represent up to 80% of inmates in institutions in the prairies, a national embarrassment that Bill C-10 will make worse.

10. How much money? With no reliable price tag for its recommendations, there is no way to responsibly decide the bill’s financial implications. What will Canadians sacrifice to pay for these initiatives? Will they be worth the cost?

Canadians deserve accurate information about Bill C-10, its costs and its effects. This bill will change our country’s entire approach to crime at every stage of the justice system. It represents a huge step backwards; rather than prioritizing public safety, it emphasizes retribution above all else. It’s an approach that will make us less safe, less secure, and ultimately, less Canadian.

(Nate Hendley is a Toronto-based author and writer. Click on this link for information on his books)

The Dishonour of “Honour Killings”

A father, mother and son have been convicted of first-degree murder in Kingston, Ontario, for the death of three young girls and a middle-aged woman. The three girls were the parents’ daughters and the middle-aged woman was the polygamous father’s first wife.

This crime has been dubbed an “honour killing”.

Honour killing can be defined as an act of murder committed by a family against one of their own members, for bringing “dishonour” to the clan, usually by violating sexual mores. The victim is usually, but not always, a female. It matters not whether the victim was herself victimized, as in a case of rape.

The worst aspect of honour killing is not actually the killing part, horrible as that may be. It is the lynch-mob atmosphere which accompanies such killings (often involving the victim’s own family or community), the cold-blooded, premeditated quality of the murders, and the fact the killers face near-immunity from punishment in certain locales. Countries such as Jordan offer specific exemptions for honour killing; murder a family member for honour in Jordan, and you can receive as little as six months in jail. A recent attempt to stiffen this punishment was voted down, on the grounds that increasing penalties might offend religious sensibilities.

Men kill women in every country in the world. In countries such as Canada, they are usually punished for it. They are not usually hailed as heroes or upholders of community values. Nor have Canadian politicians gone on record supporting honour killings as a perfectly justifiable form of homicide, as they have in Turkey and other countries.

Honour killing is not a form of domestic violence but a form of lynching. Just as male, African-Americans were once subject to torture and death at the hands of mobs, usually after being accused of sexual “crimes” (such as whistling at a white woman), so too are women murdered by collective decree for the flimsiest of reasons.

Honour killing is the natural end-product of primitive misogyny, of legal strictures binding women’s lives. In countries such as Saudi Arabia, women are not allowed to even leave home without a male escort much less drive. Pakistan, meanwhile, only recently got around to amending its laws to make it possible to punish rapists. You read that correctly; under the old law in Pakistan, a rape victim required four male witnesses to prosecute. Failure to produce a quartet of witnesses could result in jail-time for the woman who was raped. When the law was amended, thousands of religious zealots took to the streets to protest.

It is not much of a step to go from denying women basic rights under the law, to denying them their very lives, out of a psychotic sense of honour (which can be translated to mean, any attempt by a woman to assert any independence whatsoever).

Domestic homicide unfortunately happens in every country in the world.

Honour killings don’t.

And that is why a trial of two parents and a son in Kingston, Ontario have captured the world’s attention.

(Nate Hendley is a Toronto-based author and writer. Click on this link for information on his books)

Canadian Gangsters in Cinema

I attended a fascinating panel discussion last night at the TIFF Bell Lightbox (an amazing cinema complex featuring a bar, bookstore and café in downtown Toronto).

The topic: the Canadian gangster in film.

Panellists included Nathan Morlando, writer/director of the movie Edwin Boyd, Jason Eisener, director of the amazingly titled Hobo with a Shotgun and Guy Maddin, writer/director of Keyhole.

Edwin Alonzo Boyd was a flamboyant Toronto criminal who headed up a gang of bank robbers in the late 1940s and early 1950s. He is also the subject of my first book, available here.

Devilishly handsome Boyd developed quite a public following, for his looks, acrobatic technique (he liked leaping on top of bank counters, guns in hand), and ability to elude police (the so-called Boyd Gang broke out of Toronto’s Don Jail not once, but twice).

Morlando said he had been fascinated by Boyd since university.

“I was surprised that such as prominent folk-hero didn’t have a feature [film] done about him,” he remarked.

Morlando cited experimental American director John Cassavetes as an influence on his work and said he opted for a realistic feel.

“We coined the phrase ‘natural noir’ for this movie … most of the light in the film is natural,” explained Morlando.

He also said that most of the film was shot in Sault Ste. Marie (a small city in northwestern Ontario), despite the fact the action took place in Toronto. The Sault, apparently, offered an unchanged urban landscape—“many of the streets resemble Toronto of the 1940s and 1950s,” said Morlando.

Having praised Sault Ste. Marie for being stuck in a time-warp, Morlando went on to say that Boyd “was a very contemporary character in his relationship with the media … he was very self-conscious of his image.”

This was one of the reasons I decided to write about Boyd, a decade ago. That and the fact he was something of a man of mystery: according to popular legend, he never hurt anyone during his robberies (though two members of his gang were hanged for shooting a police detective). After Boyd died in his late eighties, CBC-TV suggested he might have committed an unsolved double homicide back in the late 1940s. The issue, of Boyd’s innocence or guilt in this matter has never been resolved.

As a film, however, Edwin Boyd is brilliant—a well crafted, well-made story that far outshines the limitations of its low-budget.

I caught Boyd at a showing during last fall’s Toronto International Film Festival (TIFF). The house was packed and the movie was awesome—if a bit adulatory.

Edwin Boyd is scheduled for a major North American release this April. I plan on seeing it again, and so should any Canadian true-crime fan interested in one of this country’s few media savvy bad guys.

To see all of my books (true-crime or otherwise), click on this link.

Good Reviews of My Meth Book, “Crystal Death” on Amazon UK

Average Customer Review
4.0 out of 5 stars (2 customer reviews)

Customer Reviews

4.0 out of 5 stars A book that needed to be writen, 11 Nov 2011

By TorontoListener “TorontoListener” (Toronto) – See all my reviews

Though I have never been addicted to anything (except perhaps caffeine) I consider myself to be a fairly well-read person with a working knowledge on the normal vices out there (gambling, nicotine addiction, alcoholism) but I was floored at the books portrayal of just how dangerous and destructive Crystal Meth is. It is in another league altogether, and the well-researched material in this book clearly conveys the drug’s power to ruin almost every life it touches. I congratulate those few that are able to climb out of Meth’s horrible influence, all the more reason this book’s message shouldn’t be ignored by anyone. “Crystal Death” should be required reading in schools.

4.0 out of 5 stars 4 stars, 5 Nov 2011

By Danie – See all my reviews

A very readable, hard hitting book. The input from previous users gives a validity to the facts that are presented as just that. There is very little preaching here and no talking down to anyone. What could have become an academic essay is not, all the information discussed is easily accessible to any reader and while it contains what is effectively a conclusion and future recommendation, again they are pitched so as to resonate with all

Link to “Crystal Death” on Amazon: http://qr.net/fpz5

Link to the rest of my books: http://qr.net/fg8j

Link to “Crystal Death” reviews on Amazon UK:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Crystal-Death-Americas-Dangerous-ebook/dp/B0051AC228/ref=sr_1_12?ie=UTF8&qid=1321208459&sr=8-12

Good reviews of my meth book, “Crystal Death” on Amazon

Customer Reviews
3 Reviews
5 star: (1)
4 star: (2)
3 star: (0)
2 star: (0)
1 star: (0)

Average Customer Review: 4.3 out of 5 stars (3 customer reviews)

4.0 out of 5 stars Solid fact-based book about methamphetamines, September 14, 2011

By Tina - This review is from: Crystal Death: North America’s Most Dangerous Drug (Paperback)

Nate Hendley’s book on methamphetamine use in this country is shocking. The cover alone is enough to make people think twice before using drugs. The drastic images show before and after pictures of a woman using meth for only a few years.

“Crystal Death” is fact-based and makes a strong case for not using, without lecturing. The statistics alone are a scare tactic. Once people read about the environmental hazards of meth labs and the ingredients, such as battery acid (yes, battery acid), I would be surprised if anyone educated about the facts would make a decision to use.

This is a great resource for parents to share with their teens and for schools to use in any health and prevention curriculum. The reading level is appropriates for teens as well as adults. Hendley did a solid job researching and presenting a lot of information in just over 100 pages.

Disclaimer: I received this book for free from the publisher. Help other customers find the most helpful reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars Excellent reference book, September 9, 2011
By Emily (IN, United States) – See all my reviewsThis review is from:

Crystal Death: North America’s Most Dangerous Drug (Paperback)

I didn’t think I would enjoy this book, but it was very well researched and thought out. It contains not only factual information about meth, arrests and users, but also contains information about meth in popular culture. Definitely a nice introduction book to anyone who wants to know more about meth. Easy to read. Quick book. Nice reference. Help other customers find the most helpful reviews

4.0 out of 5 stars 4 stars, November 5, 2011

By Danie - This review is from: Crystal Death: North America’s Most Dangerous Drug (Paperback)

A very readable, hard hitting book. The input from previous users gives a validity to the facts that are presented as just that. There is very little preaching here and no talking down to anyone. What could have become an academic essay is not, all the information discussed is easily accessible to any reader and while it contains what is effectively a conclusion and future recommendation, again they are pitched so as to resonate with all Help other customers find the most helpful reviews

Link to “Crystal Death” on Amazon: http://qr.net/fpz5

Link to the rest of my books: http://qr.net/fg8j